Monday, July 16, 2007

Making Sense on the Dollar

It is a little known fact that the word "communication" was originally coined to mean "spreading of communist munitions". Back in the first few decades of this past century, people spoke very rarely; it was a concern that wanton free exchange of information would educate the masses and lead them to question the harsher aspects of capitalism. Thus, silence reigned supreme, and speaking was largely viewed as an insidious means of spreading Marxist insurgent notions. Movies of the era provide proof of this; only when profits began to fall did Hollywood allow its actors to speak on film, which was a large part of McCarthy's wrath against the industry a decade later.



Of course, capitalism is nothing if not a wily, adaptable beast, and today we find ourselves beset on all sides with new ways to communicate, all benefitting the "Al ighty ollar." Unfortunately, the proliferation of means of communication has outpaced our ability to establish solid societal standards behind these newfangled technologies. We forget that it takes time to make such decisions - Alexander Graham Bell was trying to figure out what kind of greeting to give when you answer the telephone, and his first idea was to rip off sailors with "Ahoy hoy", before "hullo" became ubiquitous.

So if I am to pretend I had the power to set standards (and given my megalomaniac tendancies, this is something I am well practiced at), here's what I would enforce regarding newer methods of communication:

Text Messaging:
It has become common place to use any craptacular mangling of words when sending text messages, but I don't see the justification here. Sure, it is not a fast method of typing in general, but that's no real excuse. If you're looking for faster, then just leave a voice mail. The only situations when you're permitted to type like "ur goin 2 stor lol?" is if there's an emergency or something. "OMG jim died car reck hug firez". The only thing I skimp on in my texts are punctuation marks (occasionally), if just because that can be more of a pain than most things. Also, since I abjectly refuse to pay 5 dollars per month for unlimited texting capacity, recieving each one costs me a dime. Maybe this is why I cringe at short, misspelled texts.



Emails:
Not much to say here, but one thing needs mentioning: how is it that fairly competent people can't spot the difference between an email hoax and an un-hoax? It just seems fundamentally obvious in the way these emails are written...even when it isn't a commercial pitch. For instance, some number of months ago an acquaintance sent me an email detailing the dangers of a new date rape drug that was finding its way into circulation and being used against women. All the email was trying to do was spread caution about drinking from untrusted sources, or leaving your drink vulnerable, etc - all reminders of caution that are important be pressed hard. But the email felt fake to me, so I looked up the new date rape drug that it was talking about...and sure enough, that was a hoax. I had no idea who the hell could have started this hoax and why - there are enough reasons now to practice due caution against date rape, why muddy a good message with made-up stories? Or was it just someone who enjoys spreading dis-information (the opposite of the dot-communism/Wikipedia effect)? Very strange, to me.

Instant Messaging:
IM is not like being on the phone with someone; you're not necessarily "in a conversation." People pick up and leave, or have computer/internet malfunctions, or get distracted by shiny things, or whatever. Unless you've been in a long back and forth conversation for some time, there is no need to apologize for taking a phone call, or for not responding with alacrity...this is mostly moot since my IM habits had dwindled down to a bare minimum from my college debate work procrastination glory days of yore, but it still bears mentioning.

Note #1 - One of the history lessons I gave in the early part of this post was true, another was false. Hopefully you can discern the two.

Note #2 - While writing, a song came on the radio station that Andy leaves on in his office (perhaps the most eclectic radio station I've ever heard...like someone smashed together an indie rock station today with a poppy alternative station from 1994)...it was Peter Bjorn and John, a band I haven't heard much of. This song is the title track from their album "Writer's Block", and it kind of rocks my shit. How have I not heard this before? Embarassing. I am elated to discover that they're playing at the avalon in early September. Other bands I'm pumped to see this fall: Animal Collective, Of Montreal!!!.



Note #3 - The very first picture in this post, believe it or not, was actually more offensive in the original version. This marks the first time I've ever edited a picture I've found online to be less offensive rather than more. I did make it more colourful, though.

Friday, July 13, 2007

Open Wide For Some SOCCERRRRRRR

I don't really have a good excuse to post this link, but it is funny, so a quasi-pertinent simpsons quotation will have to suffice.

ambulatory epiphanies, take 2784

As I was walking home just now, I realized that if I lived forever, I would have time to form my Hall and Oates tribute band: Ollae and Hats. Here's the kicker: Ollae would be the one wearing all the hats!!


Death is a cruel joke.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Brian and Music

(every once in awhile I write about the history of me vis-a-vis one of the relevant aspects of my life. interesting to anyone not-me? Dubious. But it makes for good procrastination. Check the "Brian and Stuff" label for more).

My first memory of music was from when I was 3 or 4...driving in my father's 57 Chevy (the pride of his existence at the time). I think the car was close to this colour, I can't recall. The radio was playing Madonna; I didn't register it as much at the time, but I can recall him not liking it much. I have a stronger association with that car and music from just a few years later, when at some of the old timey 50s style restaurants that they have out in LA where you get served in your car. Big bopper-esque rock n' roll jamming...this might be the first time I felt a sense for anything that is "past." I have since grown impatient of the tendency to glorify the immediate past (or, even, the ancient past, aka those who think ancient greek philosophy is worth pursuing to the exclusion of everything else), but it is hardly surprising that one feels an awe at seeing the neon traces of world I can never inhabit.


MTV was present in the late 80s, and I recall seeing a Dire Straits video once, I think...but whenever I had unfettered access to a television back then, I would always choose Mario or Zelda over Money for Nothing; drawn to worlds I could conquer over ones that felt designed for an entirely different crowd.

MTV became important to me again when I was 10, 11. Living in Portland now, I was suddenly confronted with LA for the first time; via the Chronic and whatnot. Choosing the birth town by way of hip-hop (and preferring it to actual contact), I come to my most embarrassing story about my relationship to music:

For the christmas during my first year in middle school, I received my first cd player. A quaint boombox, that would be forever marred by its time spent in beach sand, chugging along to the tune of 8 D batteries. In order to justify this device and get something aside from Z100 on the radio, I requested a cd, and my mother picked up a band whose music video she had seen me watching: Kriss Kross. I kind of liked this cd, even though I sort of thought it was childish. That reservation didn't stop me when our 6th grade homeroom class had some sort of weird party thing, and I immediately volunteered to "bring the music" to show off my new device. Cut to the bus ride home; bus trips being times for me to hide underneath my cherished Oakland A's hat (which was lost on one of these bus rides, thrown out a window by some malicious student) from the 7th grade kids who would constantly make out in the seats to my front. One of these older kids asked to check out my cd player on the way home, and I gave it up without thoughts of refusal. It got passed around, and as we approached home I began to wander the aisle looking for it; someone finally passed the cd player back, but later I discovered that the Kriss Kross cd was no longer in there! I couldn't find who had taken it, and I mentioned this to my mother...not realizing that she would of course buy me another one, when I would have preferred a different cd (the novelty of jumping up and down on my bed along to "Jump, Jump!" long having since worn off). And that's how the first two cds I ever owned were both Kriss Kross.

I soon expanded my collection, thanks to the handy deals BMG and Columbia House promoted in order to get people to order cds via the mail. I'm sure that most people went in on these at some point in their lives; you would get like 12 cds for free to begin, and had to "subscribe" to their monthly offerings, and buy so many cds at full price. The real way they'd try to make money was by automatically sending you a cd in the mail each month that you'd have to pay for if you didn't return; many corporate schemes have been entirely built around knowing how lazy consumers tend to be. But if you kept up on these deals you could sign up for BMG, do the minimum to fulfill their requirements, cancel, and then sign up for Columbia House...rinse and repeat. The first albums I picked up through these means were a mixture of r&b and just random stuff: Janet Jacket's If, Lenny Kravitz, Nine Inch Nails, Aerosmith's Get A Grip, things along those lines. I listened a lot to whatever I got; when you are coming fresh faced to the music world, almost anything sounds great.

7th grade. One of the biggest changes about that grade that really made you feel "old" was that suddenly you got to choose an elective class! Some kids went into band to torture the music teacher by playing flutes, trumpets, and the like. There were a few phys ed type electives. Chess. Things of that nature. But this newfound academic freedom hammered home something I had never really realized before; I didn't actually have any interests. I was good in school - skipped a few grades of math, always years ahead in terms of reading and writing ability, had spent a lot of my time reading up on random science stuff, so my random knowledge in the areas of astronomy, geology, meteorology, and similar sciences exciting to 11 year old nerdy boys was exceedingly high. But none of those electives really spoke to me. I found myself in the general study time elective, along with a mostly unmotivated crew. I hated this time, since the other kids in there were generally pretty dumb, and therefore of the mean variety. Even if not for my peers, we were just sitting in near silence most of the time. Depressing way to spend sunny fall afternoons.

Then one day in walked a white bearded fat man wearing rainbow suspenders, who could only be described as "jolly". He looked like a burnt out hippie version of Santa Claus. The school was starting a guitar class that he would be teaching. I had a 3/4ths acoustic guitar I had been given for Christmas, so I figured, why not? My out of placeness was confirmed when I showed up with that toy guitar, surrounded by 8th graders who started off by competing with each other to see who could play the main licks from "Enter Sandman" and "Teen Spirit" the best. I quickly purchased a used Epiphone electric guitar, and began to get immersed into classic rock. That year I attended Aerosmith, Red Hot Chili Peppers, and ZZ Top concerts, and my cd collection pushed past the 50 mark.


For falling back-asswards into guitar playing, I quickly overcame the head start everyone else had. I picked up music reading far faster than anyone else, and being one of the few in a class of 30 who was capable of focusing on the sheet music at hand instead of trying to learn Stone Temple Pilot's latest sent me to the top of the class. After that year was over Mr. King had to leave Hazelbrook, but I started taking private lessons from him. By the time high school rolled around, I had picked up the bass to play in the school jazz band...but I had to play in the regular band to be in jazz band, so I switched between the upright bass and percussion. My specialties were quads (in marching band, which I loathed), the timpani, and the marimba. I've always had some weird fetish for the marimba. I don't know why.


My musical tastes in high school didn't actually change all of that much; my interest in the things I was previously interested in just grew deeper. I grew out of some of the cheesier classic rock in lieu of Zeppelin and so forth. I listened to the "main" Portland classic rock station 24/7 - literally, I would leave it on at night. It got to the point where I knew the station's rotation habits so well I would often find myself humming the song they were about to play as the current song was ending. Should I have broadened my musical horizons more? Of course! But it is hard to get introduced to things in an ultra-whitebread suburban community. The late 90s were not a good era for popular music. I even gave up playing guitar after having spent a few years assuming that it would be my future. After the band I put together my sophomore year of high school won the Tigard Battle of the Bands (we got ROBBED at our own high school's BotB, because our leadership council in all of their wisdom wanted to diplomatically give first place to the band from another high school....but Tigard's was judged by musicians and people who taught guitar lessons, and out of 4 high schools represented, we won best overall), I decided that I should give it up entirely. Mainly because it had become increasingly evident that I was drawn to academic pursuits (and debate, but that's another post altogether). I reasoned that there were millions of people who played guitar who might be better than me, but I could rise to the top of any other field I chose. So I sold my effects pedals, bass, guitars, amps...etc.

College saw the convergence of two phenomena that changed my music tastes radically:
Technology, and social standing. I suddenly was going to parties...what's more, dance parties. I've always liked to dance. Even took hip hop and ballroom dance some when I was in middle school (it is really tough to be more of an awkward kid than I was in middle school. The only way to increase my clueless isolation during that time would have been if I was a queer leper to boot). Simultaneously, suddenly everyone's music collections were available to me via the network. Before this Napster had yet to rear its head, and downloading music was a painstaking matter of getting into an IRC channel, requesting someone's shared library (usually of 100 songs or so), and then sending a request to that person's download-bot to get a particular song, which took about 30 minutes to download. I amassed about 60 songs via late nights spend doing this process (stuff like Foghat, ELO, Steely Dan...), which I was very proud of. But now I could get hundreds instantaneously, and I found myself listening to trance and club music.

My newfound interest in electronica progressed as follows: first I was into progressive house like Sasha and Digweed. I ate up the Global Underground series, and anything related to club hits of the late 90s. Not understanding this music or its roots, I chased these styles back in time to reach deep house, the direct descendant of disco mixed with a bit of techno and gospel. That took up my time for about a year, while I started exploring variants like psytrance (Infected Mushroom), and acid jazz.

My first two years I frequently attended dance parties, especially those thrown at the Shady Rill. One of the side effects of living in Walla Walla is that space isn't exactly at a premium like in many other locations. Thus, the college likes to rent some of the many, many homes it owns to upperclass folks for dirt cheap ($200/person, frequently). the Shady Rill was one of the crown jewels in the college's collection of weird houses...partly because it was only about 300 yards away from the student center, but also because it was down a tiny cul-de-sac all by its lonesome, and was surrounded by large grassy fields, trees, and a river in the backyard. It was the perfect location in a number of ways, and also a party institution at the school. It had been affiliated with theatre and debate students for years and years, and the house would get "passed down" - there'd always be at least one junior on the lease (there were 5 bedrooms), and when the seniors left, the junior(s) would handpick their roommates. It was known for its dance parties, and a counter-weight to the weak fraternity system's "get-drunk-and-evade-being-pawed-at" style of party throwing. Given that Portland and Seattle were 4 and 5 hours away, if the Shady Rill threw a party, then over 10% of the 1500 person school was going to show up. The below picture doesn't show the river, backyard, or surroundings...but the tiki torch subtly attests to the house's lifestyle (and the purple car to Eric's wackiness).



I'm on this tangent because I lived at this place my junior and senior year, and party throwing was a very important thing to me. We would do it right: enlisting frosh from the debate team to hand stuff every single student's school mailbox with our invitations, over $300 spent on booze (acquired across the border in Oregon to save on tax), 2 bartenders per hourly shift...and always a DJ. Which, when I was living there, was usually me. I worked for the Sound and Lights folks, so I would just wheel the huge amp, cd-djs, and speakers (usually along with some lighting equipment) home, set it up, and blast the hell out of the neighborhood (people across the river would occasionally call the cops, but the cops would just relay that to the Whitman security, who would send someone on a bicycle to ask us to turn it down a bit, which we would momentarily comply with. Preparing for these parties drove my music collecting to a fair amount, because I wanted to have a well rounded supply for any need or request. I took a lot of pride in our ability to squeeze in 75 or so people into our living room and hallway (the other half of the party would be outside, and in our various downstairs rooms).

I combined enjoying to DJ along with my interest in electronica with a college radio show. More than that, I got to run the electronica genre (or RPM, as it is termed), which means that all new cds in that area got sent to me to listen to, to decide what to put in the changers. Obviously I made copies of all of it, and a few bands who I love I probably never would have stumbled across otherwise (dZihan & Kamien, for instance).

After college I continued with the DJing - as a wedding and special events DJ for a crap company based out of Medford. This was a low paying job that meant spending all of my weekends driving around Oregon, looking for weird places with huge speakers and a ton of equipment stashed in my poor Honda Civic. The high school dances were horrifying (fortunately I tended to get better gigs than that), the birthdays and reunions were boring, and the weddings....would run the gambit between unbelievably fun to incredibly painful.

Nowadays, my interest has expanded to include "indie" music, although since I'm more interested in musicality than lyrics and emotions, I tend to not get into the super-lo-fi folks that aren't really inventive in their music stylings. But instead of moving on from any type of music (except for the "bad" rock and "bad" trance that I listened to when first being introduced to those larger genres), I have instead incorporated everything as time has gone on.

Sunday, July 8, 2007

Bananas Made Me Arrogant

The New York Times' Sunday magazine has an interesting article about Williams syndrome, which is a genetic condition in which the ability to recognize space and basic math concepts is gone, but one is filled with a super high desire to interact with others. This is an interesting bit I'm copying at length, because it tries to explain why people feel uncomfortable around those who are really friendly but have obvious intelligence shortcomings....and also a look into how social demands drive brain development much more than tool usage.

.........

As an experiment of nature, Williams syndrome makes clear that while we are innately driven to connect with others, this affiliative drive alone will not win this connection. People with Williams rarely win full acceptance into groups other than their own. To bond with others we must show not just charm but sophisticated cognitive skills. But why? For vital relationships like those with spouses or business partners, the answer seems obvious: people want to know you can contribute. But why should casual friendships and group membership depend on smarts?

One possible answer a comes from the rich literature of nonhuman primate studies. For 40 years or so, primatologists like Jane Goodall, Frans de Waal and Robert Sapolsky have been studying social behavior in chimps, gorillas, macaques, bonobos and baboons. Over the past decade that work has led to a unifying theory that explains not only a huge range of behavior but also why our brains are so big and what their most essential work is. The theory, called the Machiavellian-intelligence or social-brain theory, holds that we rise from a lineage in which both individual and group success hinge on balancing the need to work with others with the need to hold our own — or better — amid the nested groups and subgroups we are part of.

It started with fruit. About 15 or 20 million years ago, the theory goes, certain forest monkeys in Africa and Asia developed the ability to digest unripe fruit. This left some of their forest-dwelling cousins — the ancestors of chimps, gorillas and humans — at a sharp disadvantage. Suddenly a lot of fruit was going missing before it ripened.

To find food, some of the newly hungry primate species moved to the forest edge. Their new habitat put more food in reach, but it also placed the primates within reach of big cats, canines and other savanna predators. This predation spurred two key evolutionary changes. The primates became bigger, giving individuals more of a fighting chance, and they started living in bigger groups, which provided more eyes to keep watch and a strength of numbers in defense.

But the bigger groups imposed a new brain load: the members had to be smart enough to balance their individual needs with those of the pack. This meant cooperating and exercising some individual restraint. It also required understanding the behavior of other group members striving not only for safety and food but also access to mates. And it called for comprehending and managing one’s place in an ever-shifting array of alliances that members formed in order not to be isolated within the bigger group.

How did primates form and manage these alliances? They groomed one another. Monkeys and great apes spend up to a fifth of their time grooming, mostly with regular partners in pairs and small groups. This quality time (grooming generates a pleasing release of endorphins and oxytocin) builds strong bonds. Experiments in which a recording of macaques screaming in alarm is played, for instance, have shown a macaque will respond much more strongly to a grooming partner’s cries than to cries from other members of the group. The large time investment involved seems to make a grooming relationship worth defending.

In this and other ways a group’s members would create, test and declare their alliances. But as the animals and groups grew, tracking and understanding all those relationships required more intelligence. According to the social-brain theory, it was this need to understand social dynamics — not the need to find food or navigate terrain — that spurred and rewarded the evolution of bigger and bigger primate brains.

This isn’t idle speculation; Robin Dunbar, an evolutionary psychologist and social-brain theorist, and others have documented correlations between brain size and social-group size in many primate species. The bigger an animal’s typical group size (20 or so for macaques, for instance, 50 or so for chimps), the larger the percentage of brain devoted to neocortex, the thin but critical outer layer that accounts for most of a primate’s cognitive abilities. In most mammals the neocortex accounts for 30 percent to 40 percent of brain volume. In the highly social primates it occupies about 50 percent to 65 percent. In humans, it’s 80 percent.

According to Dunbar, no such strong correlation exists between neocortex size and tasks like hunting, navigating or creating shelter. Understanding one another, it seems, is our greatest cognitive challenge. And the only way humans could handle groups of more than 50, Dunbar suggests, was to learn how to talk.

“The conventional view,” Dunbar notes in his book “Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language,” “is that language evolved to enable males to do things like coordinate hunts more effectively. . . . I am suggesting that language evolved to allow us to gossip.”

Fallicle of Rome

I don't get homesick. It has never been in my constitution. Largely because I never had a set home for more than a year or two at a time, so it was hard to get too attached.

What I'm feeling now isn't homesickness...but hairsickness.


It was only 7 months ago that this glorious mop perched atop my noggin...judging all that it sees and finding it lacking. I miss it, and it misses me. Time for absurdly over-long hair again, I think. I shaved my head completely on Wednesday....so I'm going to time to see how long it takes to grow out fully...and establish a hair growth speed.

I miss the weird leery look slightly less.

Thursday, July 5, 2007

Last on this subject, I swear

Who would have thought that the biggest advancement in cell phones this week would come from someone aside from Apple?

T-Mobile's Hotspot at Home article at the New York Times

For those without the desire to chase the link, here's the gist: T-Mobile is releasing phones that will automagically switch over make calls over any wi-fi spot when you're in range. And they give you a free router if you start with their service!!! That means:

1. You have perfect reception when at home no matter what, or when in any location with wifi access.
2. You can save a shitload of money, because all calls made on wifi do not count as minutes that you have to pay for in your T-Mobile plan.

Considering that I live in a house that somehow is a dead spot for all cell phone networks - and live in the basement, making it even worse! - this is a really really attractive option. If you're an early adopter it is only $10 per month, which means it costs $50 per month to get INFINITE calls. There is no other setup in existence that gives you that kind of deal (except for creative skype usage, but I've never bothered with that).

So, on the one hand, you have a $600 dollar device, plus minimum $60 dollars per month...and it is no better - most say worse - at being a phone than any phone you can get for free with a new contract. On the other, you have T-Mobile revolutionizing how basic cell phone service works, and making a world of difference for people like me, and saving us money to boot. But I guess you can't watch dog skating videos on youtube without the iphone...and how could you live without that? Oh, that's right - very, very easily.

Another juicy bit of Apple news...they've been fucking over artists! This engadget post details a string of incidents in which someone was in talks to have Apple license their work for their commercials...and even though a deal didn't materialize, Apple uses it anyways!!! Gotta love that company.

Speaking of youtube, here's something you have got to see. This guy stuck a jet engine in a kayak, and then races across glacier-covered iceland against a Land Rover. It includes the epic line:
"Shaun must be getting tired...the jet engine has roasted his buttocks!!"

Tuesday, July 3, 2007

iPhone = Iraq War

I know that almost no one gets my vitrol on this subject, but I just can't help myself.

The Iraq War, in historical perspective (or, the perspective of people who weren't fucking idiots and were screaming at the top of their lungs for reason once the 9/11 dust cleared), looks like this:
US gets attacked by group angry about our presence in the Middle East, everyone rallys around the flag. Conservative group in power sees perfect opportunity to complete four pet goals at once: 1. give rich and powerful corporate executive friends infinite oil-slick handjobs (or in Cheney's case, outright whacking off, considering how much money he still gets from Haliburton) 2. focus public anger against an external threat for political gain, 3. try to run the experiment of successfully using American military hegemony, both to overthrow the spectre of Vietnam and to be able to have more influence in the world at large, 4. Do the rash thing that Daddy was too wise to do. George HW Bush got an ear stud in the first Gulf War, so his son had to go way further to rebel (Prince Albert).

The war was sold to the public as a means of protecting ourselves in the war that had been started on the enemy...except it was against a different enemy, and the war strengthened the enemy, and caused many innocents to become enemies by spreading poverty, neptostically appointing friends to run/control the country's resources, etc. In short, the announced reason for the war was never the real reason for the war, and the war actually had the OPPOSITE effect of what we said it would do. This is a peculiar form of irony that is specific to the 2000s America. A cultural mood of self-defeating fakeness. The exact formula applies with a number of the other Bush political policies (tax cuts, energy policy, etc.)


The EXACT same logic is at work with the iPhone. Every single review - even those ones that gush about its multimedia playback capabilities, as if mp3 and video players larger than 8gb had yet to be invented or something - mentioned the biggest area of inadequacy of the iPhone being....the fucking phone!!! That's 5/6ths of the name they fucked up! It is on the worst carrier in the US, the price is outrageous, it is complicated and clunky to make and answer phone calls. Apparently the way to "revolutionize" phone usage is to make it really obnoxious. The only thing revolutionized is the extent to which consumers will thank a company on their knees for the right to grossly overpay (the profit margins on the iPhone, like all other products, are HUGE. Apple gets away with price rape just because no one has the self-esteem to say no!). Oh, and the reason why they went with AT&T? no other phone carrier would allow Apple to keep a big chunk of the yearly phone fees for themselves. What a fuck you to the consumer!! The iPhone wasn't about making phones better; it is finding a way to get people to buy a multimedia player (aka, the ipod) AGAIN, and to make them more reliant on itunes/apple crap. What genius product is next, Apple? The iPorto'Potty, where instead of a toilet inside, there's just a bunch of food? Or the iSunGlasses that end up just shining superfulous lights in your eyes?



Nothing Apple has ever done has been genius from an invention standpoint, just a business/marketing standpoing. OS X has a few strong advances on XP, but a lot more GAPING holes! (no DirectX, no systems rights customization, no domains and thus no good for businesses/colleges, no support for thousands and thousands of free software out there, no alternatives to crappy/evil programs like itunes). And that's the best thing they've ever done - that operating system. Mac hardware is nothing to be impressed about, especially since they don't make the important parts anymore. Windows sucks dick in a number of ways itself, but it is vastly easier to avoid using flawed products with so many free alternatives floating around. Apple is a small-market-share monopoly, whereas Microsoft is a huge market share in that it has its finger in everything, but you can easily avoid actually giving any money to them.


Edit: In my anti-Apple rant, I ended up fudging some facts when I was trying to identify OS X negatives. Which I realized only after the fact (it supports active directory fine, the ones I use at work just have that disabled). I'm not totally as irrational as I seem; I recommended that my ex-roommate Kerri switch from a pc laptop to a macbook because she doesn't know anything about computers and the simplicity would help her. But I, like every other computer enthusiast, balks at Apple's monolithic approach to its overpriced hardware. I'm going to be building my own machine this summer once the core2duo 6850 price drop hits that far outstrips the highest end desktops Apple has available, for a dramatically reduced cost. But if I didn't do anything with my computer except surf the web, liked wasting money, and didn't hate the Apple aesthetic..then I might make the switch and enjoy OS X's handful of nice features (although except from target mode and a few UNIX command line tricks you can do, I can't think of any that would benefit a single user).

Sunday, July 1, 2007

meloncollie

"Da man! You iz da man! Do you hear me?! You da man!! How much $$ coming tomorrow? Did we get some more $$ in?" - Jack Abramhoff, 2002

Either you think that a revolution is necessary, or you are disgusting. There is no in-between. If I were not so selfish and craving of every second I had, I would devote my life to trying to make change happen. Or rather, I would if I thought that someone in my circumstances ever COULD. Obama is nice and important, but there is no visible path into overall positive change that does not begin with radical environmental disaster. I avoid feeling attached to the vast majority of humans, because most are in such a state...I am too weak to weep for the fate they are writing for themselves.

(And yes, I realize I probably just put myself on a number of watch-lists because no one knows how to listen).